India, jahaan alag-alag dharmo ka mel-jol hai,, has historically promoted the right to freedom of religion. However, the issue of religious conversion, particularly mass conversions, has ignited heated debates in recent times.
Absolutely, haal hi mein ye “Religion conversion” or “Dharma Parivartan” pe bahut charcha ho rahi hai.
This newsletter aims to unpack these complexities without bias, exploring the legal framework, social concerns, and ongoing discussions.
Article 25 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion. Basically baat ye hai ki Indian Constitution kehta hai ki hamare paas right hai koi bhi religion exercise karne ka, aur jab chahe, religion change karne ka bhi.
This includes the right to convert, though not explicitly mentioned. However, this freedom is subject to public order, morality, and health, leaving legal room for interpretation and potential restrictions.
Allegations of conversion and questionable practices: Claims of conversions driven by allurement, pressure, or even force have fueled anxieties, especially within communities that may be more susceptible.
Social tensions and political discourse: Sensitive religious conversions can heighten tensions between different faiths and be exploited for political gain, presenting a challenge to social harmony.
State-level legislation: In response to these concerns, some states have introduced anti-conversion laws, sparking debates about the balance between protecting religious freedom and navigating legal intricacies.
Interfaith dialogue and understanding: Building bridges of understanding and respect between communities is crucial to address concerns and promoting social harmony.
Separation of religion and state: Maintaining a neutral state, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring fair procedures are vital for handling complex legal cases and safeguarding religious freedom.
While the Indian Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to “freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion” (Article 25), it doesn’t explicitly mention the right to convert. This absence fuels ongoing debates and legal disputes.
Some interpret this silence as an implied right to convert, included in the broader freedom of religion. Some argue that individuals must have the agency to independently explore and embrace new faith perspectives. Others, however, contend that conversion, especially when involving vulnerable communities or alleged conversion, requires regulation.
Navigating the Impact of Anti-Conversion Laws
These laws, with different rules, are usually designed to stop dishonest or coercive conversions. However, worries exist about how they might be misused. Critics ka kehna hai ki in laws jisme political aur social agendas jude hai can become tools for harassment and discrimination against minority faith communities. They fear it could create an atmosphere of suspicion and suppress genuine religious exploration and coercion.
The legal landscape on this issue is dynamic, with many anti-conversion laws facing legal challenges in courts. Arguments revolve around their constitutionality and potential infringement on fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of a balanced approach, one that safeguards religious freedom while preventing genuine coercion.
Navigating this legal complexity requires careful consideration of various perspectives and nuanced interpretations. The future of religious conversion in India hinges on how courts and lawmakers grapple with this complex interplay of individual rights, social concerns, and political agendas.
